HWID Spoofer Guide — The Complete 2026 Reference

Shift 1 — TPM 2.0 + Secure Boot went from optional to mandatory. Riot Vanguard already required both on Windows 11 (the VAN9001 error code is the kill switch). In February 2026, Epic mandated TPM 2.0, Secure Boot, and IOMMU for all Fortnite PC tournaments — that's the VideoCardz coverage of the rule change. FACEIT requires the same for CS2 anti-cheat tier. BSG announced TPM 2.0 + Secure Boot rollout for Escape from Tarkov in their April 2026 anti-cheat overhaul. The net effect: a TPM-aware anti-cheat can now anchor your hardware identity on the TPM's cryptographic endorsement key — which most spoofers cannot touch.

Shift 2 — Hardware-rooted attestation entered the mainstream. Microsoft added Remote Attestation to its anti-cheat developer docs in 2025 and Activision deployed it in Call of Duty: Black Ops 7. At boot, the client now pings Microsoft's servers and cryptographically attests the entire boot chain. If your TPM endorsement key is on the banned list, the game refuses to start — and the ban is rooted in cryptographic identity, not anything a spoofer can rewrite. Microsoft Pluton (the chip-integrated security processor shipping on new AMD Ryzen and Intel processors) extends this further: identity goes from "a value stored in firmware that we can hook" to "a value computed by silicon that you cannot fake."

Shift 3 — Ban-wave scale exploded. Riot disclosed 2.3 million HWID bans in 2025. The January 2026 Valorant wave specifically targeted outdated spoofers (340,000 accounts in 5 days). Activision's Ricochet system has issued 800,000+ HWID bans across Warzone and modern COD titles. Even legacy software-only ACs like BattlEye and Easy Anti-Cheat have shifted to weekly or bi-weekly waves. The honest implication: anti-cheats no longer have to catch you in the moment of cheating. They roll up flagged hardware fingerprints into bulk waves where stale spoofers are caught months after the fact.

The takeaway. A spoofer that worked in 2024 wasn't necessarily "bad." Anti-cheats just moved past the identifier layer that older spoofers targeted. The 2026 spoofer needs to hook a wider set of hardware-reading APIs, persist across reboots in ways that survive Secure Boot's chain-of-trust validation, and explicitly NOT make false promises about TPM EK or Pluton root-of-trust spoofing (which is, today, beyond reliable software-level intervention).

Easy Anti-Cheat (Epic). Reverse-engineering work on the adrianyy/EACReversing repository plus the partial leak of EasyAntiCheat.sys source documents EAC's fingerprint construction. The driver reads SMBIOS via NtQuerySystemInformation class 76 (SystemFirmwareTableInformation), hits SCSI registry paths under HKLM\Hardware\DeviceMap\Scsi, pulls CPU info from the CentralProcessor registry key, enumerates the NetworkAdapter class GUID {4d36e972-...}, reads the MachineGuid from the Cryptography registry hive, plus the Windows Activation Technologies AdminObject store, plus a WMI block via IoWMIOpenBlock / IoWMIQueryAllData. Every value is normalized and SHA-hashed into a single composite. Games covered: Fortnite, Apex Legends, Rust, DayZ, Squad, Halo Infinite, dozens more.

BattlEye. The ACM MATE Workshop 2025 paper "Battling The Eye" reverse-engineered BattlEye's BEDaisy.sys driver and confirms its hardware read includes SMBIOS, disk serial numbers via IOCTL_STORAGE_QUERY_PROPERTY, MAC addresses via NDIS, and — critically — a PCI configuration-space scan that includes Xilinx 7-series FPGA fingerprinting (the chip family that powers most consumer DMA cards). BattlEye's hardware reads are as much about catching DMA cheats as about HWID enforcement. Games covered: PUBG, Rainbow Six Siege, Escape from Tarkov, Arma series, several legacy titles.

Riot Vanguard (vgk.sys). Vanguard is the hardest target in 2026 by every measurement. It loads as an Early Launch Anti-Malware (ELAM) driver — so it boots BEFORE almost any other kernel driver. It reads SMBIOS, motherboard UUID, CPU ID, RAM SPD serials, MAC addresses, disk serials, monitor EDID, peripheral IDs, TPM endorsement key + PCR (Platform Configuration Register) values, and runs a UEFI firmware allowlist that blocks known-vulnerable BIOS versions (VAN:Restriction). A successful Vanguard spoof needs to hook 12+ identifier reads simultaneously plus survive Secure Boot's chain-of-trust validation. Games covered: Valorant, League of Legends. We do not sell Valorant cheats specifically because the cost-of-ownership math on a sustained Vanguard bypass doesn't work; the HWID Spoofer for Vanguard cluster covers what little actually works.

Blizzard Warden + per-title kernel layers. Warden is the user-mode anti-cheat Blizzard inherited from World of Warcraft and runs across all Battle.net titles. It's been reverse-engineered for years; HackMag's older analysis walks through how it scans process memory for signatures. Warden does not run a kernel driver by itself — it runs inside the game process. On COD Modern Warfare 2 onward, Blizzard added Ricochet, a per-title kernel-mode AC, that does the heavier hardware fingerprinting. Black Ops 7 added Microsoft Remote Attestation on top of that. Games covered: World of Warcraft, Overwatch 2 (no kernel AC), Diablo, COD: Warzone / MW / BO6 / BO7 (Ricochet kernel).

NetEase NeacSafe (Marvel Rivals). This is the one most competitor blogs get wrong — they call it EAC. It isn't. NetEase ships its own in-house kernel-mode anti-cheat that goes by NeacSafe64.sys / NetEase Game Security service. Independent driver analysis published in June 2025 by 0x90.sh documents the driver internals: VMProtect 2.x/3.x packed, no DriverUnload routine, loads via %TEMP% then deletes the on-disk copy after kernel load, no kernel-to-user heartbeat. It reads SMBIOS, motherboard serial, disk IDs, MAC, GPU device ID, RAM modules. Critically, NetEase HWID bans cascade across all NetEase titles — one detection in Marvel Rivals also locks you out of Naraka: Bladepoint, Identity V, Once Human, and other NetEase games on the same hardware fingerprint.

Why this matters in practice. A spoofer marketed as "works against EAC and BattlEye" might genuinely succeed against both because their identifier sets overlap significantly. But if you take that same spoofer to Vanguard, the additional TPM read fires and your composite is back to your original hardware. Buying "a spoofer" without checking which AC it's actually tuned for is how most users eat their first failed-spoof ban.

SMBIOS (UUID, Serial, Manufacturer, Product, BIOS version, BIOS release date). Read via NtQuerySystemInformation class 76 (RSMB), or direct SMBIOS table parse via EFI_SMBIOS_PROTOCOL. Tracked by every kernel AC (EAC, BattlEye, Vanguard, Ricochet, NeacSafe). Spoofable via kernel driver hook on the read path. UEFI-level persistence is harder but does exist for the dedicated.

Motherboard Serial Number (firmware-baked, part of SMBIOS Type 2). Read alongside the rest of SMBIOS. Tracked by every kernel AC. Spoofable via driver hook, but the real motherboard serial cannot be permanently rewritten without flashing the firmware itself (one-way operation, not recommended).

Disk Serial Numbers (SATA / NVMe per-drive serial). Read via IOCTL_STORAGE_QUERY_PROPERTY (StorageDeviceProperty) or direct ATA IDENTIFY DEVICE command on the storage controller. Tracked by every kernel AC. Spoofable by hooking storport.sys or disk.sys dispatch routines, or by intercepting at the controller path.

GPT / MBR Disk Layout (partition GUIDs, partition table identity). Read via IOCTL_DISK_GET_DRIVE_LAYOUT_EX. Tracked by EAC and BattlEye. Spoofable via the same driver-layer dispatch hook chain.

MAC Address (every NIC including virtual / hidden). Read via GetAdaptersInfo, NDIS, or directly from the registry's NetworkAdapter device instance under NetCfgInstanceId → NetworkAddress. Tracked by every AC. Trivially spoofable at the registry layer or via NDIS hook — this is the easiest identifier to randomize.

GPU UUID / Adapter LUID (per-GPU instance identifier). Read via DXGI IDXGIAdapter::GetDesc or device instance ID. Tracked by EAC, Vanguard, NeacSafe. Spoofable at the driver layer but harder than the storage-side hooks because graphics APIs are more numerous.

Monitor EDID (Extended Display Identification Data — read from panel firmware). Read via EnumDisplayDevices or DDC over the video cable. Tracked by Vanguard and EAC at the high-profile tournament tier. Spoofable with effort but most consumer-grade spoofers don't touch it. Monitor swap is the alternative.

CPU ID (the silicon-baked CPUID, plus the registry copy under CentralProcessor). Read via __cpuid intrinsic from kernel context, or registry. Tracked by EAC, Vanguard. Hard to spoof — CPUID from Ring-3 is privileged, requires either a hypervisor or a kernel-level CPUID interception, both of which add their own detection surface. The registry copy is trivially spoofable but anti-cheats cross-check against the silicon read.

TPM Endorsement Key (EK) + PCR values (cryptographic identity from the TPM 2.0 chip). Read via TPM 2.0 commands routed through tpm.sys. Tracked by Vanguard, Ricochet (BO7+), FACEIT, Fortnite tournaments. Very hard to spoof. Only Samuel Tulach's tpm-spoofer proof-of-concept has documented an attempt, and it has known reliability issues. Raw Spoofer does NOT touch TPM EK — we're explicit about this.

Microsoft Pluton hardware root (CPU-integrated security processor identity, attested to Microsoft cloud). Used by anything implementing Microsoft Remote Attestation, including COD: Black Ops 7. Effectively not spoofable at the consumer level. This is the long-term direction the entire AC industry is heading.

MachineGuid (HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\MachineGuid). Read by every AC. Trivially spoofable — single registry value rewrite.

Windows Product ID + Install Date (registry-stored). Read by EAC and NeacSafe. Trivially spoofable.

BIOS UUID + Vendor + Release Date (SMBIOS Type 0). Same spoof path as the rest of SMBIOS.

RAM Module Serials / SPD data (SMBIOS Type 17 — per-DIMM serials). Tracked by Vanguard, BattlEye (Tarkov specifically), Ricochet. Spoofable via the same SMBIOS hook.

USB Controller IDs (PnP enumeration). Tracked by EAC (Fortnite tournament tier) and Vanguard. Spoofable.

PCI Device VID/DID + configuration space (direct PCI config read). Tracked by BattlEye (primarily for DMA detection), EAC, Vanguard. Spoofable but spoofing risks DMA-detection collision — if the spoofer randomizes the values BattlEye uses to fingerprint DMA cards, you may end up flagged as DMA hardware.

Of these 16 identifiers, our Raw Spoofer handles all of the practically-spoofable ones (SMBIOS, motherboard, disk, layout, MAC, GPU, MachineGuid, BIOS, RAM, USB, PCI, plus monitor EDID). It does NOT touch the silicon-rooted ones (CPU ID via Ring-3, TPM EK, Pluton). The deeper How HWID spoofers actually work cluster walks through the engineering tradeoffs.

Layer 1 — Driver-level hooking (where Raw Spoofer and most commercial spoofers operate). A signed kernel driver loads early in the boot sequence — before the anti-cheat's kernel driver fires. The spoofer driver installs hooks on the Windows kernel functions and IOCTLs that anti-cheats use to read hardware identifiers: NtQuerySystemInformation for SMBIOS, IOCTL_STORAGE_QUERY_PROPERTY for disk serials, NDIS hooks for MAC, the relevant DXGI / WMI / registry read paths. When the anti-cheat queries, it gets back randomized values instead of your real hardware identity. The randomization persists for the session and is regenerated next reboot. This is the standard model.

Layer 2 — UEFI-level persistence. Some spoofers persist randomized values across reboots by writing into UEFI NVRAM (the non-volatile RAM the BIOS uses to store boot configuration) or by injecting into the EFI boot sequence. UEFI persistence is much harder to detect via runtime memory scanning because the changes are baked in before the OS even loads — but it requires deeper engineering and carries higher risk of bricking the firmware. Raw Spoofer does not currently operate at this layer for safety reasons; we randomize per-session at Layer 1.

Layer 3 — TPM / hypervisor / silicon spoofing. Modifying TPM endorsement keys, intercepting CPUID from a hypervisor below the OS, attacking Pluton's chip-to-cloud attestation chain — these are research-grade techniques. Tulach's tpm-spoofer is the only public proof of TPM EK randomization and it's unstable. Hypervisor-based CPUID hooks are real but trade off against the hypervisor itself becoming a detection signature. No commercial spoofer in May 2026 credibly delivers all three at scale. Raw Spoofer does not operate at Layer 3 — and any vendor claiming TPM EK spoofing or Pluton bypass at $30/month is misrepresenting their product.

The honest 2026 architecture. A good 2026 spoofer does Layer 1 hooks deeply, randomizes the broadest possible set of identifiers (16+), avoids sentinel values that anti-cheats flag instantly (e.g. a SMBIOS serial of FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF is a guaranteed instant flag), and works alongside — not against — the user's actual TPM 2.0 + Secure Boot configuration. Tournament-tier titles like Vanguard and Fortnite-tournament are out of scope by design. Casual / ranked play on EAC, BattlEye, NeacSafe, Warden, and Ricochet remains in scope.

Forward-looking. The bypass infrastructure isn't standing still. Active engineering across our 6-product lineup keeps the techniques moving — we don't lean on any single hook chain that an anti-cheat can sign once and kill forever. We don't publish the recipe because publishing it shortens its shelf life. The practical effect is that our detection windows have held across multiple EAC + BattlEye + NeacSafe rebuild cycles in 2025-2026.

The Microsoft Lumma takedown. In May 2025, Microsoft's Digital Crimes Unit (DCU) seized 2,300 domains that were distributing the Lumma infostealer family. A meaningful share of those domains were hosting fake "free HWID spoofer" installers. Within weeks of the takedown, Lumma operators had migrated to new domains and resumed distribution. The takedown was meaningful but it didn't end the threat — it changed which URLs are dangerous and forced the operators to rebuild visibility.

What free spoofers actually do. Acronis Threat Research Unit's investigation into Vidar Stealer 2.0 confirmed the standard playbook: the fake spoofer installer drops a payload that harvests your Chrome / Firefox / Edge saved passwords, your Steam session tokens, your Discord tokens, your crypto wallet keys (MetaMask, Phantom, Exodus, hardware wallet companion apps, browser-extension wallets), your 2FA backup codes if they're stored anywhere on disk, and any browser-cached banking session cookies. Lumma, RedLine, StealC, and Vidar 2.0 are the four most common payload families. They're all engineered for silent exfiltration — you won't get symptoms until you check your wallet balance.

The GitHub honeypot pattern. Search GitHub for "free HWID spoofer" and you'll find dozens of repositories with the same profile: fresh account, recent push, README with confident-sounding feature list, a Releases tab with a Windows .exe flagged by 30+ antivirus vendors on VirusTotal. Many include a script that adds the spoofer directory to Windows Defender's exclusion list as part of the install — the user is told this prevents "false positives." In reality it just disables the user's last line of defense.

The Trustpilot evidence. Search the Trustpilot reviews for the major "free / cheap" HWID spoofer vendors. The pattern is consistent: many one-star reviews describing "my Steam account got compromised after running this," "my crypto wallet was emptied," "my Discord got hijacked and used to spam." These are the symptoms of an infostealer infection, not a spoofer failure. The Trustpilot pages for HwidSpoofer.com and SlothyTech in particular have multi-year accumulations of these reports.

The math on paid vs free. A paid spoofer from a reputable vendor is $4.99-$15 per month. The average financial loss from a single Lumma / Vidar infection — assuming you have any crypto, any Steam library worth $100+, or any browser-saved banking credentials — runs into the thousands of dollars. The expected-value math overwhelmingly favors paid. The cluster on Free HWID spoofers — the Lumma trap goes deeper.

Option A — Spoofer. Cost: $5-15 per month. Setup time: under 5 minutes. What it fixes: hooks the anti-cheat's hardware reads at the kernel layer so the AC sees a randomized fingerprint instead of your real hardware. What it doesn't fix: silicon-rooted identifiers (CPU ID, TPM EK, Pluton). What it requires: a kernel driver that the spoofer vendor signs and ships. The big advantage is reversibility — when you uninstall the spoofer, your real hardware identity returns, so you don't lose your legitimate account access on titles you don't cheat on.

Option B — Hardware swap. Cost: $300-1,500 depending on which components. What it fixes: physically replaces the hardware that's been fingerprint-banned. What it doesn't fix: identifiers that aren't on the swapped components — most users assume motherboard swap is enough, but disk serials, RAM SPD serials, NICs, GPU UUID, and TPM EK are all on components people don't replace. The honest minimum hardware swap for a clean re-entry under modern AC is motherboard + storage + NIC card + RAM modules, which is the entire "upper half" of a PC and easily clears $800.

Option C — Format drive. Cost: $0. What it fixes: literally nothing for HWID ban purposes. The disk wipe removes installed software, files, and Windows registry state — but the anti-cheat's HWID composite reads from firmware (SMBIOS, motherboard, disk serial, MAC) which all survive a format. A Windows reinstall on the same hardware produces the same fingerprint. This option is included here only because it's the most common bad advice on community forums; do not format your drive expecting to dodge a HWID ban, it does not work.

The decision matrix. If you've been HWID banned and you want to keep playing the affected game, the answer is almost always Option A (spoofer). Option B makes economic sense only if you were planning a PC upgrade anyway and the ban is the trigger that justifies it. Option C makes sense if your goal is privacy (clean install before selling a PC) but does nothing for cheating-related concerns. The deeper HWID spoofer vs hardware swap vs format drive cluster walks through edge cases (used PC purchased with existing ban, multi-account family sharing scenarios, hardware ban appeal probability).

Step 1 — Stop playing the affected game. Don't open the game, don't open the publisher's launcher (Epic, Battle.net, Riot, Steam, etc.), don't even open Discord with your old account active. Every session your banned identity is online is another telemetry datapoint the AC's models use to fingerprint future attempts to circumvent.

Step 2 — Verify the ban scope. Is it a single-game soft ban (account-level only), a per-publisher ban (e.g. all Battle.net), or a true HWID ban (composites stored on the AC's servers)? Each scope has a different recovery path. The publisher's support page usually states which scope the ban is. EAC bans cascade across EAC-published titles unless the title's publisher (Epic, etc.) opted out — that's the unspoken risk in playing multiple EAC games on the same hardware.

Step 3 — Buy and run Raw Spoofer (or equivalent) on a cold boot. Spoofer activation must happen BEFORE the publisher's launcher opens. The anti-cheat's first hardware read fires at launcher startup; spoof after that and the AC has already captured your real fingerprint.

Step 4 — Create a new publisher account. Fresh email (different domain if possible), fresh username, fresh password. Do not reuse 2FA seeds. Do not share any account artifact (display name, profile picture, friends list) with the old account.

Step 5 — Use a different payment method. Anti-cheats can correlate accounts via payment fingerprint — same card, same Stripe customer ID, same Apple Pay token, same PayPal email. Use a different card or use a crypto payment with a fresh wallet address.

Step 6 — Use a different IP for the first session. A residential VPN or a different home network for the initial login. After 1-2 sessions, you can drop the VPN — the IP isn't the primary identity surface, but it's a contributing signal for the first 24-48 hours.

Step 7 — Don't restore your old configs / friends / cosmetics. Anti-cheats track behavioral fingerprints. If a brand-new account immediately has the same competitive settings, same friends list, and the same playstyle quirks as a recently-banned account on the same hardware, that's a behavioral re-link signal independent of HWID.

Step 8 — Play conservatively for the first 5-10 hours. No ranked queue immediately. No tournament participation. Play casual / quickplay until your new account has some legit telemetry.

Step 9 — Keep the spoofer running every session. First-time users sometimes assume the spoofer is a one-time fix. It isn't — every session needs the spoofer to randomize values before the AC reads them.

Step 10 — Don't reuse Discord servers / forum accounts associated with the banned identity. Account-link bans (Battle.net Season 3 grouping ban, Epic 28-day teaming-ban policy) can propagate from the banned account if you group up with old friends on the new account.

Step 11 — Monitor for re-detection. Check the spoofer vendor's status board / Discord daily for the first 2 weeks. If the spoofer ships an update mid-week, install it before your next session. The deeper recovering from a hardware ban cluster walks through each step with screenshots and decision branches.

Everything is in-house. Raw Spoofer is written and maintained by our own team — same engineers, same shared SDK, same offset pipeline that powers Raw Fortnite, Raw Rust, Raw Rivals, Raw Arc Raiders, Raw Overwatch, and Raw PUBG. Most spoofer brands you've seen are reseller storefronts: their "spoofer" is a re-skinned upstream product, and when the upstream gets popped, every reseller eats it together. We're not in that network. When Raw Spoofer ships an update, it's because we wrote and tested it ourselves.

External architecture. Raw Spoofer runs as its own process and never injects code into your game or your publisher's launcher. External design is meaningfully harder for kernel-mode anti-cheats to detect than internal/injected spoofers because the AC's signature scanner can't sweep memory regions it doesn't own. This is one of the reasons our detection-free windows are longer than the commercial average.

No DMA, no UEFI firmware writes, no TPM EK lies. Pure software. Single machine. Single download. We do NOT write to UEFI NVRAM (the risk of bricking customer firmware isn't worth the marginal stealth benefit). We do NOT spoof TPM endorsement keys (no commercial spoofer credibly does, despite what some sites claim). We do NOT bypass Microsoft Pluton (that's not a thing in 2026 at the consumer tier). The honesty about what we don't do is the foundation for trusting what we do do.

Shared SDK across six products. When we improve a hook chain in the shared spoofer code, all six game cheats and the Raw Spoofer benefit on the next build. The recent menu and infrastructure overhaul that landed across the lineup was simultaneous across products — single team, single design language, single offset pipeline. This is the kind of engineering pattern most paid spoofer brands don't have because they don't write their own code.

Cross-version, cross-vendor compatibility. Windows 10 + Windows 11 supported. Intel + AMD CPUs. Intel, AMD, and NVIDIA GPUs. We don't restrict our supported hardware list to avoid awkward edge cases. The status block at the top of the Raw Spoofer product page shows the live compatibility matrix.

Continuously evolving anti-detection infrastructure. We treat the bypass stack as a moving target, not a static product. Multi-layered design means we don't lean on any single hook that an AC can sign and kill in one push. We don't publish the technical specifics — publishing them shortens their shelf life — but the practical effect is that our detection windows have held across multiple EAC, BattlEye, NeacSafe, and Warden rebuild cycles. The roadmap includes deeper driver-layer hardening and infrastructure improvements that we deploy transparently without requiring customer redownloads.

Identifier coverage. Raw Spoofer randomizes SMBIOS (UUID, Serial, Manufacturer, Product, BIOS version, BIOS release date), motherboard serial, all disk serials (SATA + NVMe), GPT/MBR layout, every NIC's MAC address, GPU device UUID, MachineGuid, Windows Product ID + install date, RAM SPD serials (where readable), USB controller IDs, PCI device IDs (avoiding DMA-collision sentinel values), and monitor EDID (basic randomization, not full re-emulation). Total: 16 identifier categories. This is the full practical spoofable surface at the kernel-driver layer.

$4.99 entry price, no upsells. One license. All identifier coverage. Run on every session. No tiered "premium spoofer" upgrade; the product is what you see. Pair it with any game cheat and Discord support is 24/7 from the same team.

Test 1 — Do they acknowledge what they DON'T do? A vendor that claims to spoof TPM EKs, Pluton roots, CPU IDs, and Microsoft Remote Attestation is lying. A vendor that explicitly states which identifiers they cover and which they don't is being honest with you. Honesty about limits is the single best signal that the rest of the product is real.

Test 2 — Do they name the anti-cheats they're tuned for? "Works with all anti-cheats" is marketing fraud. A real spoofer is tuned for the specific hardware-read patterns of specific anti-cheats. Look for explicit AC names: EAC, BattlEye, NeacSafe, Ricochet, Warden. Bonus credibility if they explicitly say what they don't cover (e.g. "not tuned for Vanguard").

Test 3 — Do they update for AC version bumps? Anti-cheats ship signature updates every 2-3 weeks now. A vendor whose status page says "last updated 3 months ago" is shipping an outdated product and you will get banned. Check the update cadence before buying.

Test 4 — Trustpilot footprint without infostealer-symptom reports. Search the vendor's Trustpilot page for terms like "Steam compromised," "wallet emptied," "Discord hijacked." If those appear with any frequency, the vendor is shipping infostealer payloads alongside or instead of a real spoofer. Walk away.

Test 5 — Public Discord with active customer presence. Real customer threads with real response times from staff. Hidden Discords behind paywalls are a red flag — legitimate spoofer vendors want their support quality visible.

Test 6 — Honest refund policy in writing. Specific terms ("refund within 24 hours if not yet activated; pro-rated credit if spoofer goes down for >12 hours of AC patching") are credible. Vague "satisfaction guarantee" copy is not.

Test 7 — Compatibility matrix in writing. Windows versions, CPU vendors, GPU vendors. If the vendor only lists their hardware as "compatible with most modern PCs" without specifying, they don't actually test against the full matrix.

The cluster comparison Raw Spoofer vs HwidSpoofer.com vs SlothyTech runs these seven tests on the major 2026 spoofer vendors.

Step 1. Buy Raw Spoofer from the product page. License key is delivered to your purchase email instantly.

Step 2. Cold-boot your PC. Don't open Steam, Epic, Battle.net, Riot Client, or any other game launcher yet.

Step 3. Download the Raw Spoofer loader (link in your purchase email) and run it as administrator. Windows Defender or your AV may flag the loader — this is expected. Allow the launch.

Step 4. Enter your spoofer license key. Click "Activate." The spoofer randomizes the 16 identifier categories listed in Section 8 and persists the new values for the session.

Step 5. Launch your game's publisher / launcher normally. The anti-cheat's first hardware read at session start will pull the randomized values, not your real hardware.

Step 6. Play. Repeat the spoofer activation step every cold boot before launching the game.

If anything fails — license issue, loader not launching, AV blocking — Discord support is available at discord.gg/rawcheats. Most issues resolve in under 10 minutes during waking hours.